|
|
Post by nuggetzmini12 on Nov 17, 2004 16:34:33 GMT -8
vote and speak out ;D really think about the chicken or th egg  |
|
|
|
Post by BunnyRabt on Nov 17, 2004 16:54:37 GMT -8
oh boy...this is really gonna bring out a touchy subject...but I think if you believe in God being the creator of all things, it has to be the chicken first. He didn't create a baby first, he created Adam. And so on down the line....chicken would lay the egg after it was created.
ok...jump on this one guys!!! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by cherry1217 on Nov 17, 2004 19:00:50 GMT -8
i guess i dont understandy why they pick on the poor chickens? i mean which came first: the snake or the egg? the calf or the cow? the pony or the horse? why chickens?  |
|
|
|
Post by nuggetzmini12 on Nov 17, 2004 20:10:10 GMT -8
i guess i dont understandy why they pick on the poor chickens? i mean which came first: the snake or the egg? the calf or the cow? the pony or the horse? why chickens? wow good point ;D but then we mostly think of chicken when it comes to eggs .........well some of us ....i think  |
|
|
|
Post by cherry1217 on Nov 17, 2004 20:52:05 GMT -8
wow good point ;D but then we mostly think of chicken when it comes to eggs .........well some of us ....i think the guppie or the fish?? sooo many other options! |
|
|
|
Post by cutie_kristin on Nov 18, 2004 14:54:58 GMT -8
I think the egg... Because I think it came from another animal like a "terydactal" or another bird species, and just was born with a problem like the ugly duckling. SO therefore he was born (the chicken) from the egg. The same mother bird who had the newly appointed chicken gave birth to another egg that was a girl this time and also a chicken. The boy chicken and the girl chicken fell in love and had more chickens.
In biology we were talking about being made or born with a defect or something, so that is kinda where i got it from, but i have thought this for a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by nuggetzmini12 on Nov 18, 2004 16:38:23 GMT -8
the guppie or the fish?? sooo many other options! actaully a guppie is a TYPE of fish. i think u should say the fish egg or the fish ;D |
|
|
|
Post by dlfreak on Nov 18, 2004 18:56:51 GMT -8
Silly cherry... granted all babies have to come from a parent but eggs aren't exactly babies... they are hard shells that develop babies inside them which makes it more interesting because how would an egg get there with out something to lay it? Now this is where my theory comes into this... and bunny, I say it was the chicken but it has nothing to do with religion... it has to do with sheer logic (This is where the touchy part comes in, IMO, because some people don't believe in evolution) Anyway... The chicken came first. Every living organism on the planet evolved from the "primordial soup" every tree, plant, bug, and animal evolved from microscopic organisms and evolved over time into how they look today. Chickens evolved to walk on the land and they soon evolved to lay eggs instead of carrying their young like most mammals. Chickens came first and their method of reproducing (eggs) evolved over time (came later). Thus, Chicken came first.  |
|
|
|
Post by cherry1217 on Nov 18, 2004 20:48:20 GMT -8
actaully a guppie is a TYPE of fish. i think u should say the fish egg or the fish ;D one in the same lol |
|
|
|
Post by felicia on Nov 18, 2004 22:59:48 GMT -8
wow good point ;D but then we mostly think of chicken when it comes to eggs .........well some of us ....i think i do,I always associate chickens with eggs,back to the topic.....i really don't know!maybe i agree with bunny! |
|
|
|
Post by nftysqrt69 on Nov 19, 2004 16:10:07 GMT -8
Lol silly bruin you have to make everything all scientific but I agree the chicken came first. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by nuggetzmini12 on Nov 19, 2004 16:44:34 GMT -8
Silly cherry... granted all babies have to come from a parent but eggs aren't exactly babies... they are hard shells that develop babies inside them which makes it more interesting because how would an egg get there with out something to lay it? Now this is where my theory comes into this... and bunny, I say it was the chicken but it has nothing to do with religion... it has to do with sheer logic (This is where the touchy part comes in, IMO, because some people don't believe in evolution) Anyway... The chicken came first. Every living organism on the planet evolved from the "primordial soup" every tree, plant, bug, and animal evolved from microscopic organisms and evolved over time into how they look today. Chickens evolved to walk on the land and they soon evolved to lay eggs instead of carrying their young like most mammals. Chickens came first and their method of reproducing (eggs) evolved over time (came later). Thus, Chicken came first. ummmm can u say that again dl i am only 11 and i don't understand any of these BIG words ;D |
|
|
|
Post by TNgirl924 on Nov 20, 2004 5:50:17 GMT -8
For the same reasons as bunny, I say the chicken came first.
|
|
|
|
Post by __teenagedirtbags__ on Nov 20, 2004 6:04:43 GMT -8
I think the egg... Because I think it came from another animal like a "terydactal" or another bird species, and just was born with a problem like the ugly duckling. SO therefore he was born (the chicken) from the egg. The same mother bird who had the newly appointed chicken gave birth to another egg that was a girl this time and also a chicken. The boy chicken and the girl chicken fell in love and had more chickens. In biology we were talking about being made or born with a defect or something, so that is kinda where i got it from, but i have thought this for a while. I agree with kristin, I think the egg came first. I mean its only logically to say that chickens come from eggs, so why should the first chicken be any different??? |
|
|
|
Post by dlfreak on Nov 20, 2004 10:50:15 GMT -8
Heathens!
|
|
|
|
Post by nuggetzmini12 on Nov 20, 2004 11:43:19 GMT -8
heathens wat does dat mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by krisconcepcion19 on Nov 20, 2004 12:22:36 GMT -8
I agree with bunny, for the same reasons that she states.  |
|
|
|
Post by krisconcepcion19 on Nov 20, 2004 12:26:21 GMT -8
Heathen means:
a pagan, or anyone that is not a Jew, Christian, or a Moslem. Or it can be a person who is regarded as uncivilized, irreligious,etc.
I really don't understand why dl said that though. I mean he was saying the whole evolution theory of why the chicken came first.
|
|
|
|
Post by dlfreak on Nov 20, 2004 13:56:16 GMT -8
lol, I didn't mean it. It was more of a badly executed joke because no one was agreeing with my scientific explanation.... generally "educated" people call those who don't believe in the logic of science heathens |
|
|
|
Post by krisconcepcion19 on Nov 20, 2004 16:44:06 GMT -8
Um no, that's not what that term means at all. I checked on the definition in the dictionary and it's what I stated.
|
|
== 
== 
